Home Anti-gun Why is the media so quiet about the Boston bombers’ guns?
2

Why is the media so quiet about the Boston bombers’ guns?

0
2

tsarnaev-suspects-boston-bombing[LEGALLY ARMED AMERICA] When multiple people were shot in Aurora, CO, we talked about how the attacker legally got his guns and then the Second Amendment was repeatedly attacked. When Adam Lanza murdered 20 children and 6 adults in a gun-free zone in December, all we heard about was how easily he obtained the legal guns he had. The cowardly Boston bombers used guns and a hail of gunfire to fight off police and even managed to kill one with their guns. So why no outrage? Why isn’t anyone questioning where or how they got their guns? Why in the world are all the gun-grabbers and media so quiet? Here’s why: The guns they had were not possessed by these Muslim extremists legally.

That’s right, according to Cambridge Police Commissioner Robert Haas, neither Tamerlan Tsarnaev nor his brother Dzhokhar had permission to carry firearms. In the state of Massachusetts – one of the strictest gun control states in the nation – a person is not allowed to own a firearm without a permit.

And for the true bed-wetting gun-grabbers out there, don’t even bother to bring up the theory that they somehow obtained the guns via the “gun show loophole” and lack of a background check because not only would the older brother most likely have been denied a permit due to his earlier questioning by the FBI, but the younger murderer – 19 – was too young to be issued a permit or buy a firearm. The guns they had were either stolen or purchased illegally. Clearly NO gun control law would have prevented them from having the guns they used to murder an MIT police officer. Sorry gun-grabbers…you lose.

  • Adam Lanza did not obtain his guns legally. Whatever his mother did to secure her guns, clearly what not enough.

  • aceman

    I don’t think Adam Lanza ever even existed to begin with.

    Wrap your head around that for a bit!